Newsletter - August 5, 2002
Four
Seasons profit sags, sees lower 2002 earnings
(Reuters) -
Four Seasons Hotels Inc. (FS)
(FSH),
a barometer of the top-end travel sector, reported a drop in second-quarter
profit on Friday due to a bigger than expected loss at its New York luxury
hotel and weak demand for rooms at its U.S. city properties.
Four Seasons
revised its 2002 earnings per share estimates downward, saying that the
"remainder of the year will be challenging due to the ongoing weakness in
corporate travel demand."
Isadore Sharp,
chairman and chief executive, said he expects Four Seasons to earn between
C$1.47 and C$1.57 a share, down from a previous estimate of between C$1.72 and
C$1.76 a share.
"Booking
windows have stayed relatively short, making it difficult to forecast demand
levels," Sharp said.
Four Seasons,
with about 55 luxury hotels around the world, reported earnings of C$18.1
million ($11.4 million), or 48 Canadian cents a share, in the quarter ended
June 30. That beat an average estimate of 31 Canadian cents a share by 11
analysts polled by Thomson First Call.
In the second
quarter of 2001, Four Seasons earned C$28.2 million, or 72 Canadian cents a
share.
During this
year's second quarter, the Four Seasons New York hotel, The Pierre, took an
operating loss of C$11.5 million, nearly C$3 million more than expected.
Revenue per
available room -- a gauge of profitability for hotels -- fell 5.8 percent
during the quarter, primarily because of a 2.6 percent decline in occupancy
levels.
Four Seasons
said delays in the start of construction of its Residence Club Sedona at Seven
Canyons will reduce fees by C$7.4 million this year.
"We are
introducing more Four Seasons properties to new key markets, enhancing our
ability to attract business to our new and existing properties," Sharp
said.
Four Seasons
shares have fallen about 20 percent this year, closing at C$60.07 a share on
the Toronto Stock Exchange on Thursday. They have underperformed rival
Fairmont Hotels (FHR),
which have remained flat in the same time.
($1=$1.59
Canadian)
Hilton
Follows Peers, Lowers Outlook
(Reuters) - Hilton
Hotels Corp. (HLT.N) on Tuesday reported second-quarter earnings
that held up better than many of its peers, but lowered its outlook for the
rest of the year bringing it more in line with the rest of the struggling
hotel industry.
Investors
greeted the news with guarded optimism, bidding up Hilton shares by 13 cents,
or 1 percent, to $11.53 on the New York Stock Exchange. That gain was better
than any of its peers, most of which reported losses, and also edged out a 0.4
percent gain for the broader S&P 500.
Hilton reported
second-quarter net income of $76 million, or 20 cents a share, compared with
$86 million, or 23 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenue fell 5 percent, to
nearly $1.04 billion.
Analysts polled
by market tracking firm Thomson First Call had, on average, forecast earnings
of 20 cents per share, with estimates ranging from 18 cents to 21 cents.
Hilton reported
total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and noncash
items of $303 million in the quarter, down from $345 million a year ago.
But the figure
that surprised investors and analysts was a 6.1 percent decline in Hilton's
average revenue per hotel room for its comparable owned properties in the
quarter.
The decline was
more modest than that for either of its two biggest rivals, Marriott
International Inc. (MAR.N) and Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide Inc. (HOT.N), which reported second-quarter declines of 8 percent
and 10 percent, respectively.
GRADUAL
IMPROVEMENT
Earlier in the
second quarter, Hilton and Marriott both said they expected average revenue
per room to come in at the lower end of or below previous forecasts. Analysts
blamed a stall in the industry's fledgling recovery as an expected rebound in
business travel failed to materialize.
``We are in fact
seeing the gradual improvement we expected early this year, and things are
getting better,'' Hilton Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bollenbach said in a
conference call to discuss the results. ``Unfortunately, the improvement is
not as fast as we originally anticipated.''
Bollenbach said
Hilton is focused on rebuilding hotel occupancy, which dropped sharply as
people delayed or canceled trips en masse after Sept. 11. But company
officials declined to say specifically why Hilton's hotels performed better
than Starwood's or Marriott's in the second quarter.
The company was
more in sync with its peers in announcing new third-quarter forecasts that
were down sharply from previous expectations.
It said it
expects third-quarter earnings of about 10 cents a share, or well below the
average First Call estimate of 17 cents. It said it expects full-year 2002
earnings in the low- to mid-50 cents range, again well below the average
analysts' forecast of 62 cents.
The company said
total revenue would be about flat in the third quarter from a year earlier and
down 2 percent to 4 percent for the year. It said revenue per room for its
owned hotels would be flat to down 2 percent in the third quarter and down in
the low single digit percent range for the year.
``All things
considered, Hilton's second-quarter numbers were OK,'' said J. Cogan, a senior
research analyst at Banc of America Securities. ``The (room revenue)
environment in the second quarter was disappointing for the lodging
industry.''
In a separate
matter, Hilton said it took a $10 million charge in the second quarter related
to the discovery of mold in its $95 million Kalia tower, part of its Hilton
Hawaiian Village resort at Waikiki.
It said the
charge includes an estimated impairment loss for certain fixed assets, as well
as the cost for investigative work and rectification of the problem.
Felcor’s
Second Quarter 2002 Funds From Operations $0.69 Per Share
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (NYSE: FCH), one of
the nation’s largest hotel real estate investment trusts (REITs), today
reported operating results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2002.
FelCor’s second quarter 2002 recurring Funds From Operations (“FFO”) was
$45.7 million, or $0.69 per share, which exceeded consensus analyst estimates
of $0.68.
FFO for the same period last year totaled $65.3 million, or $0.98 per share.
Assuming the 88 leases acquired on July 1, 2001, had been acquired on January
1, 2001, pro forma FFO would have been $72.4 million, or $1.08 per share for
the second quarter 2001.
Second quarter 2002 recurring Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, and other non-cash charges (“EBITDA”),
totaled $94.6 million, compared to $111.4 million in the second quarter of
2001 and $118.5 million for the pro forma second quarter of 2001. The
Company reported net income of $13.0 million, or income per share of $0.12,
compared to the second quarter 2001 net income of $22.6 million, or income per
share of $0.31 and pro forma second quarter 2001 earnings of $24.1
million. Second quarter 2002 net income includes a $5.9 million
gain from the previously announced sale of the Allerton retail space in
Chicago, Illinois, and the sale of the Doubletree Guest Suites® hotel in Boca Raton, Florida.
For the six months ended June 30, 2002, FFO was $75.1 million, or
$1.12 per share, compared to the same period last year of $136.8 million or
$2.05 per share and on a pro forma basis was $141.3 million. EBITDA for the six months was
$171.8 million, compared to $228.8 million for the same period last year and
$233.3 million for the same period on a pro forma basis. Net
income for the six months was $6.9 million, compared to prior year of
$15.8 million and pro forma prior year of
$50.5 million. The prior year six months net income reflected
$36.2 million of lease termination expense recorded in the first quarter of
2001.
FelCor’s
total hotel portfolio RevPAR for the second quarter was 11.1 percent below
that of the same period in 2001, with 56 percent of the decline related to
average daily rate (“ADR”).
Compared to the same months in 2001, RevPAR for April decreased 8.9 percent,
May decreased 13.1 percent, and June decreased 11.3 percent. For the
quarter, occupancy was down 3.7 percentage points, to 65.7 percent, and ADR
was down 6.0 percent, to $98.33, compared to the same quarter in 2001.
For the six month period, RevPAR decreased 14.6 percent. The RevPAR
decline for the month of July is estimated to be in the range of 5.0 to 6.0
percent, compared to prior year.
“The
industry’s recovery has not kept pace with previously anticipated levels,
which is the result of the continued softness in corporate transient
business,” said Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr., FelCor’s President and CEO.
“Despite this challenging economic environment, our total portfolio
occupancy levels remain relatively strong at 66 percent, compared to the
industry average of 63 percent. The economic recovery is taking longer
than expected, but we remain optimistic that RevPAR, as compared to prior
year, will continue to improve on a steady and gradual basis.”
The
operating margin for FelCor’s portfolio was 35.5 percent during the second
quarter of 2002, and represented a decline of 240 basis points, compared to
the same period last year.
However, FelCor’s operating margin for the second quarter increased from the
33.6 percent reported for the first quarter of 2002.
During
the second quarter of 2002, interest expense, net of interest income, was
$41.6 million, compared to $40.3 million for the second quarter of the prior
year, and for the six months was $82.8 million compared to $79.6 million in
the same period last year. The increase during the second quarter is
primarily related to excess cash carried during 2002 and the related increase
in average debt outstanding, compared to the same
period of 2001.
Capital
Structure:
At
June 30, 2002, FelCor had $151.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, and had
no borrowings outstanding under its $615 million unsecured line of credit.
At quarter end, FelCor had $1.9
billion of debt outstanding with a weighted average life of seven years and a
weighted average interest cost of 8.3 percent. The Company’s debt
maturities for the remainder of 2002 are $6 million and 2003 maturities are
$35 million.
Since December 31, 2001, FelCor has reduced its outstanding debt by $56
million.
In
the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold non-strategic assets for net
proceeds of
$23
million. FelCor sold retail space at its Allerton Crowne Plaza®
hotel in Chicago, Illinois, with net sales proceeds of $16.7 million and sold
its 183-room Doubletree Guest Suites hotel in Boca
Raton, Florida, with net sales proceeds of $6.5 million. The Boca
Raton hotel had been previously identified as held for sale. The Holiday
Inn® in Colby, Kansas, is under contract for sale with an
anticipated August closing and net sales
proceeds of $1.7 million.
FelCor
issued $25 million of perpetual preferred equity in April, and amended its
unsecured line of credit in June 2002.
“The
sale of assets, issuance of perpetual preferred, and the amendment of the line
of credit were steps taken to maintain our financial flexibility and to
position FelCor for growth,”
said Richard
J.
O’Brien, FelCor’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
In
July 2002, FelCor acquired the 208-suite SouthPark Suite Hotel in Charlotte,
North Carolina for $14.5 million, and the 385-room Wyndham® Myrtle
Beach Resort and Arcadian Shores Golf Club in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina,
for $35.3 million.
FelCor will convert the SouthPark Suite Hotel to a Doubletree Guest Suites
hotel, and the Wyndham Myrtle Beach to a Hilton® hotel. Both
hotel acquisitions were funded from
excess cash held on FelCor’s balance sheet.
Additional
information can be found on the Company’s website at
www.felcor.com.
Mandarin
cautious despite 96pc profit lift to US$ 12m
SCMP -
Luxury hotel operator Mandarin Oriental
International yesterday reported a 96 per cent surge in first-half profits
but warned an uncertain global economy continued to affect business.
After tax and minority interests, the first-half profit was
US$ 12.2 million, helped by lower interest expenses and a US$ 5-million
write-back of development costs for a hotel in Washington. The company, a
unit of Jardine Matheson, made US$ 6.2 million in the first half of last
year.
Excluding the write-back, net profit was US$ 7.2
million, up 16.12 per cent year on year. Net finance charges fell 11.25 per
cent to US$ 14.2 million, while administrative expenses shed 29 per cent to
US$ 15.4 million.
Turnover slipped 3.88 per cent to US$ 272 million.
Chairman Simon Keswick said: "Uncertainty in the global
economy continues to affect business, and booking patterns remain shorter
than usual.
"The combined total revenue from the group's hotels
declined due to the continued weakness in average room rates but prudent
cost containment, together with the favourable interest rate environment,
enabled the group to achieve some improvement in underlying profit."
Analysts said an improved result for one company was
insufficient to conclude the hotel industry had recovered from the
devastating impact of the September 11 attacks.
Last week, rival group Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels
announced a 14 per cent drop in net profit to HK$ 121 million for the first
half.
Although Mandarin Oriental's two Hong Kong hotels - the
Mandarin Oriental and The Excelsior - showed some improvement in occupancy
rates, average room rates fell as much as 17 per cent.
Hong Kong and Macau contributed US$ 8.6 million, or 41.34
per cent, of the group's first-half operating profit.
Earnings per share were 1.43 US cents. No interim dividend
was declared, against 0.5 US cent per share a year ago.
UBS Warburg analyst Eric Wong attributed the unexpectedly
good result mainly to a sharp reduction in interest costs and a lower base
of comparison last year.
"It is too early to revise its full-year result
although its performance in Southeast Asia, excluding Hong Kong and
Singapore, has picked up," Mr Wong said.
Another analyst said: "The Hong Kong luxury hotel
sector is pretty tough and has not recovered yet. I don't expect the luxury
hotel market to improve in the second half of the year."
Mandarin Oriental financial director John Witt said the
latest result represented a strong recovery in occupancy rates from the
second half of last year.
The hospitality industry suffered a sharp decline in
business and leisure travellers after the September 11 terrorist attacks.
Mr Witt was confident of the prospects for the top-end
market due to limited new supply of luxury hotel rooms in the next two years
and a positive trend in tourist arrivals in Hong Kong.
"I think the first six months has been a very good
start with our occupancy rate exceeding our expectations," he said.
Source: South
China Morning Post
Barry
Sternlicht of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide to Provide Keynote
Address at the 13th Annual Hotel Investment Conference Asia Pacific (HICAP)
ASIA Travel Tips.com
- Barry S.
Sternlicht, chairman and chief executive officer of Starwood Hotels &
Resorts Worldwide, Inc. will address delegates at the 13th Annual Hotel
Investment Conference Asia Pacific (HICAP) on October 17, 2002. HICAP,
formerly known as the Asia Pacific Hotel Investment Conference, will be held
October 16-18, 2002 in Hong Kong.
According to HICAP
founder Rob Stiles of Sonnenblick-Goldman Company, Sternlicht was invited to
provide the keynote speech because of his worldwide reputation as a dynamic
and inspiring hotel leader. "Barry is one of the most respected leaders
in the hotel industry today. His ideas and leadership have brought
innovative, new products and programs to the hospitality community,"
stated Stiles. HICAP Co-Chairman Robert Hecker of Horwath Asia Pacific
added, " Barry heads up one of the leading hotel and leisure companies
in the world with more than 740 properties in over 80 countries. Our
international delegates no doubt will benefit from his insights into the
trends and issues affecting the hotel industry performance and product
evolution."
Among his
accomplishments, Sternlicht has received accolades for introducing a
revolutionary new guest room design for the Sheraton brand and the creation
of Westin's famous "Heavenly Bed". USA Today reported that
Starwood's Preferred Guest Program to be the top loyalty program in the
world, less than four months after it was inaugurated. Sternlicht also is
credited with the launch of the wildly popular W Hotels brand, with hotels
in major United States cities and in Sydney, Australia and under development
elsewhere in Asia".
During the
precarious time of October 2001, HICAP drew nearly 300 delegates from over
20 countries. Stiles and Hecker both anticipate a capacity crowd for this
year's event. "Registrations are running about 50% above last year's
pace at this time. The quality of the program, and inclusion of Barry
Sternlicht to the list of speakers, is expected to lead to a sell-out this
year, " according to Stiles.
Source:
ASIA Travel Tips.com
Holiday
Inn Hotels Celebrates 50th Anniversary
August
1, 2002 marked the 50th anniversary of America's Hotel, Holiday Inn Hotels
& Resorts.
American entrepreneur Kemmons Wilson opened the first Holiday Inn hotel in
1952 in Memphis, Tennessee, after he returned from a family road trip
discouraged over the lack of family and value-oriented lodging.
Over the past fifty years, Holiday Inn has retained those core ideals of
family, value and entrepreneurial spirit and has grown to become the most
recognized lodging brand in the world.
Holiday Inn really set the standard for the hotel industry, said Greg Price,
vice president of marketing for Holiday Inn. Today, we have more than 1,600
hotels across the world, and more people stay at Holiday Inn every day than
anywhere else.
At the first Holiday Inn hotel, children stayed free, and the hotel offered
a swimming pool, air conditioning and restaurant at the property.
Telephones, ice and free parking were standard as well. Although commonplace
today, these services were revolutionary at the time and set a standard for
the hotel industry and for every Holiday Inn hotel that would follow.
As a driving force in the evolution of American lodging, Holiday Inn has
paved the way for many other firsts in the full-service hotel category it
created. Holiday Inn was the first national hotel franchisee organization
and the first hotel company to sell a franchise. In 1963, it became the
first hotel company to be publicly traded. The brand was the first hotel to
offer in-room air conditioning, free in-room television, a swimming pool and
an on-site restaurant.
In a continuing effort to deliver a high standard in the midscale lodging
category, Six Continents Hotels, the owner of the Holiday Inn brand, has
allocated $250 million over the next five years to build 25 Holiday Inn
hotels in a new prototype design. Groundbreaking on the first new prototype
is expected to happen this fall.
Over the years, the Holiday Inn family has extended to include the Holiday
Inn Select brand for business travelers and Holiday Inn SunSpree Resorts for
family fun. In addition, Six Continents Hotels created new brands such as
Holiday Inn Express, the fastest growing hotel brand over the last decade,
as a limited-service hotel offering for value conscious travelers, and
Staybridge Suites by Holiday Inn as an extended-stay lodging option.
On August 1, the Holiday Inn brand marks their 50th birthday by ringing the
closing bell at the New York Stock Exchange.
The
Changing World of Trade Buyers
Issues
facing buyers by and large, buyers (comprising of travel agents, tour
operators and wholesalers) are being affected by the following factors:
1)
Consolidation among both buyers and sellers
2)
Market-share battles by the mega-groups
3)
Airline financial problems, commission- and other forms of
cost- cutting, restructuring and development of loyalty programmes
4)
Insurance costs
5)
Consumer protection regulations
6)
Changes in lifestyles, consumer travel habits, including
concerns over safety, fickle loyalty, shorter booking periods and shifts to
stable destinations
7)
Development of Internet booking systems and the growth of
direct-sell, bypassing middlemen
8)
Internal costs of restructuring, re- equipping, training and
marketing, to name just a few challenges. At the same time, this is
impacting on both travel marts and sellers themselves.
Buyers
are becoming very selective about the marts they attend, and mart-organisers
have to make sure that participating buyers will find the products they are
looking for. Both have to ensure improved quality of contact.
Australia’s
Advantage For the most part, Australia qualifies as a ‘good buy’ for
several reasons: It is a stable country, relatively free of personal safety
fears and travel advisories; it has reversed seasonality; has a
multi-cultural, environmentally-conscious infrastructure with a huge
diversity of tourism products; and the industry is generally well-managed
and responsive. It is, overall, a ‘desirable’ destination with potential
for generating high-yield business.
The
Australian Tourist Commission also spends an enormous amount of time
researching market trends and customer profiles, constantly fine- tunes its
product offerings in line with those trends and supports productive buyers
with tools to improve their business performance. These factors, among
others, make the Australia Tourism Exchange an attractive show for buyers.
At the same time, it yields a rich harvest of information about the changing
profile of buyers.
The
Globalisation Onslaught The global consolidation and expansion onslaught by
the major U.S. and European travel groups will have a significant impact on
the future of the industry. They are seeking to cut unit costs and build
market share by linking up with other companies with access to distribution
networks and databases. This is being done via outright purchases,
cross-equity links, franchises, etc.
Their
ability to use negotiating power to drive down prices and seize business is
obvious. The borderline between wholesaler and retailer is fudging. All are
cross-pollinating. At the ATE, one major German wholesaler made this quite
obvious by offering six different brochures and the potential to sell via
10,000 travel agencies. Here are some of the emerging trends: All aspire to
become one-stop shops to encourage the customer to buy everything from the
one place, and keep buying from that place in the future.
Many
are now selling directly over the Internet and using their own magazines and
direct mail systems to reach customers. The days of printed brochures are
set to fade. They are broadening their choice of products and services, but
narrowing the number of suppliers in key categories like hotels. Some are
trying to get into niche-market territory by setting up specialist
departments focussing on destinations or fast-selling niche-products like
wellness and ecotourism.
The
Future of the Independents For the independents, it has clearly become a
matter of life and death. But their biggest asset is the value they place in
their independence. With that comes a corresponding determination to avoid
becoming part of a large, monolithic organisation with its constant
restructuring, cost-cutting, staff transfers, internal politics, ego battles
and other problems.
One
clear opportunity lies in specialisation. In terms of products, huge
opportunities are emerging for small and medium-sized independent operators
to focus on market segments that are still beyond the return-on- investment
targets of the mega-groups. Such segments include senior travel, sports
travel, travel by youth, students and backpackers, upmarket products,
indigenous travel, wine tours, honeymoon packages, gay and lesbian travel.
Here are some examples of new trends: One European company that specialised
in group travel is "now changing more and more to upmarket and deluxe
FITs." One Irish agency is run by a husband and wife team. Formerly a
High Street retail travel agent, they now operate a Web-booking engine,
business house travel section and wholesale arm specialising in Australia
and New Zealand.
Wanting
to become a one- stop shop for Irish agents, they also hold GSAs for various
Australian products. Some niche-market agents are establishing partnerships
with other tour operators and wholesalers who can cross-sell their products.
For example, a specialist in golf tours links up with a wine-tour
specialist. One Italian operator began focusing on Australia after years of
specialising only in the Caribbean. One U.S. tour operator specialising in
gourmet tours now works with wine-tasters and top chefs to develop cooking
courses. Another U.S. agent focuses only on filling off- season beds and
seats at "great prices."
Travel
Web sites are also buying directly. One invited Web site buyer, who was
formerly an airline ticket consolidator, claims to be the leading online
pan- European tour operator and is planning a significant expansion of its
land product programme to give passengers "the widest range of
accommodation and broadest choice of ancillary product across all regions of
Australia." One South Pacific tour operator specialises in handling the
French military traffic which it describes as having high amounts of
disposable income and high yield. Some are specialising in accommodation
only.
In addition to offering some mainstream products, they offer
boutique hotels, luxury resorts, private homes and apartments. This product
range is being buttressed with luxury cruises and boat charters. One Belgium
group says it only offers exclusive small-scale properties in unique
locations. One buyer specialises in wildlife holidays to remote locations.
One group has linked up with ticketing companies to sell only sports events
like cricket matches, football, rugby, World Cup, Olympics, etc, calling
itself a ticketing and tour operator. Others are also adding theatres and
concerts, anything that involves tickets. There were two buyers from such
companies, one of which is focussing not just on selling tickets but the
entire management of visitors to sports events complete with logistics,
transport schedules, accommodation, security and passes.
Trends
in Asia
GROWING
MATURITY OF THE CHINESE MARKET: After the initial chaos of the early days
of outbound travel, the growing professionalism of the Chinese market is
noticeable. Chinese buyers are part of huge conglomerates with huge economic
strength and an extensive business network that gives them a good source of
regular, corporate and incentive travel. Many are cross-linked with
companies in Hong Kong SAR to access that market. They are increasingly
becoming members of international organisations such as IATA and PATA and
seeking higher standards of certification and professionalism.
Some
of them are moving beyond groups and into individual travel, study tours or
special interest travel. Many are spending time working on improving
multi-language capabilities for their guides. Chinese operators dominate the
turf in their respective regions. All appear to be very conscious of their
reputation, size, level of respect and the number of travellers they send
overseas. Some are setting up specialised departments to sell specific
destinations such as Australia and New Zealand. Many are looking for new
products to cater to the evolving taste of Chinese travellers.
Most
do both inbound and outbound. In future, they will soon be at the
professional level of operators in Hong Kong SAR where FIT travel is the
rage and payments can be made over the Internet. Sellers wishing to tap the
Chinese market will need people who can speak the language. Australia has
many ethnic Chinese who are robustly capitalising on this asset.
MEGA-GROUPS
EXPANDING: In Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, India and many other parts of Asia,
mega- groups are making inroads and finding no shortage of local partners
anxious to get global coverage, bring in a number of business travel
accounts, and secure access to training, automation and distribution. Travel
companies affiliated to charge-card companies are also growing their
distribution networks. One Hong Kong SAR agency, focusing on niche markets
such as special interest tours, study programmes, events management and
deluxe FIT travel, has set up another company to take care of conferences
and incentives.
INDIA,
ANOTHER BIG GROWTH MARKET: Like China (PRC), India is another big potential
growth market, but one with a much less structured industry. The sheer size
and diversity of the market means infinite opportunity for operators to tap
into niche segments: conferences, honeymooners, students, adventure,
incentives, cruises, etc. Buyers are also Internet-savvy and anxious to
establish new destinations. However, culinary requirements are very
specific.
Operators
also have to provide services like visas and foreign exchange handling. They
are spreading their offices nationwide and acquiring GSAs. While the
widespread use of English is an advantage, they are very sharp negotiators
due to the size of the market.
JAPAN,
MORE SPECIALISATION: The mass-market tour operators are expanding their
distribution networks into more cities and becoming more specialised,
leading the specialist tour operators to burrow even deeper. One operator
linked to a major airline has now opened a division focusing only on the
silver market. Another buyer who specialises in hotels has begun to sell
direct to customers. In addition to hotel vouchers, it is now adding
vouchers of other travel components to FIT trips. For example: sightseeing,
optional tours, golf packages, weddings, cruises, rent a car.
KOREA
(ROK), STRONGER INDUSTRY EMERGING: Since the 1997 economic crisis, Koreans
have won plaudits for the way they have restructured many of their
companies. Before 1997, Korean tour operators were considered mostly
tour-group oriented and interested mainly in shopping commissions. Today,
one of the invited buyers at the ATE described his company thus: ÒWe've
made our multidisciplinary focus and integrated approach the foundation of
building strategy, marketing segmentation, sales promotion, online strategy,
enterprise systems and processes for our clients' competitive advantage.
Several are expanding into specialist niches such as honeymooners,
backpackers, young adventurers, etc, all of which indicates the growing
sophistication of the market.
SOURCE:
PATA

Ehotelier.com is a proud sponsor of the Center for Hospitality
Research
|