Hotels and Hotel Chains, Culinary Art, Food and Beverage the one stop website for hoteliers
Global Hotelier's Mail


FREE EMAIL    @ehotelier.com
JOIN HERE - FREE
Categories
Job Search
Job Agencies/Portals
Global Staff Movements
Hotel Chains
Hotel Directories
Associations
Magazines 
Books
Global Hotelier's Mail
Hoteliers' Forum
Marketing
Food & Beverage
Culinary 
Wine
Hotel Schools
Consultants/Mgmt
Conventions/Events
Equipment/Supplies
Technology
Accounting/Finance
Brokers/Investments
Cool Links
Breaking News
News Archive
eHotelier Store
 


For Info Click Here

 

.


Newsletter - August 5, 2002

Four Seasons profit sags, sees lower 2002 earnings

(Reuters) - Four Seasons Hotels Inc. (FS) (FSH), a barometer of the top-end travel sector, reported a drop in second-quarter profit on Friday due to a bigger than expected loss at its New York luxury hotel and weak demand for rooms at its U.S. city properties.

Four Seasons revised its 2002 earnings per share estimates downward, saying that the "remainder of the year will be challenging due to the ongoing weakness in corporate travel demand."

Isadore Sharp, chairman and chief executive, said he expects Four Seasons to earn between C$1.47 and C$1.57 a share, down from a previous estimate of between C$1.72 and C$1.76 a share.

"Booking windows have stayed relatively short, making it difficult to forecast demand levels," Sharp said.

Four Seasons, with about 55 luxury hotels around the world, reported earnings of C$18.1 million ($11.4 million), or 48 Canadian cents a share, in the quarter ended June 30. That beat an average estimate of 31 Canadian cents a share by 11 analysts polled by Thomson First Call.

In the second quarter of 2001, Four Seasons earned C$28.2 million, or 72 Canadian cents a share.

During this year's second quarter, the Four Seasons New York hotel, The Pierre, took an operating loss of C$11.5 million, nearly C$3 million more than expected.

Revenue per available room -- a gauge of profitability for hotels -- fell 5.8 percent during the quarter, primarily because of a 2.6 percent decline in occupancy levels.

Four Seasons said delays in the start of construction of its Residence Club Sedona at Seven Canyons will reduce fees by C$7.4 million this year.

"We are introducing more Four Seasons properties to new key markets, enhancing our ability to attract business to our new and existing properties," Sharp said.

Four Seasons shares have fallen about 20 percent this year, closing at C$60.07 a share on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Thursday. They have underperformed rival Fairmont Hotels (FHR), which have remained flat in the same time.

($1=$1.59 Canadian)

Hilton Follows Peers, Lowers Outlook

(Reuters) - Hilton Hotels Corp. (HLT.N) on Tuesday reported second-quarter earnings that held up better than many of its peers, but lowered its outlook for the rest of the year bringing it more in line with the rest of the struggling hotel industry.

 

Investors greeted the news with guarded optimism, bidding up Hilton shares by 13 cents, or 1 percent, to $11.53 on the New York Stock Exchange. That gain was better than any of its peers, most of which reported losses, and also edged out a 0.4 percent gain for the broader S&P 500.

 

Hilton reported second-quarter net income of $76 million, or 20 cents a share, compared with $86 million, or 23 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenue fell 5 percent, to nearly $1.04 billion.

Analysts polled by market tracking firm Thomson First Call had, on average, forecast earnings of 20 cents per share, with estimates ranging from 18 cents to 21 cents.

 

Hilton reported total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and noncash items of $303 million in the quarter, down from $345 million a year ago.

 

But the figure that surprised investors and analysts was a 6.1 percent decline in Hilton's average revenue per hotel room for its comparable owned properties in the quarter.

The decline was more modest than that for either of its two biggest rivals, Marriott International Inc. (MAR.N) and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. (HOT.N), which reported second-quarter declines of 8 percent and 10 percent, respectively.

 

GRADUAL IMPROVEMENT

 

Earlier in the second quarter, Hilton and Marriott both said they expected average revenue per room to come in at the lower end of or below previous forecasts. Analysts blamed a stall in the industry's fledgling recovery as an expected rebound in business travel failed to materialize.

``We are in fact seeing the gradual improvement we expected early this year, and things are getting better,'' Hilton Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bollenbach said in a conference call to discuss the results. ``Unfortunately, the improvement is not as fast as we originally anticipated.''

Bollenbach said Hilton is focused on rebuilding hotel occupancy, which dropped sharply as people delayed or canceled trips en masse after Sept. 11. But company officials declined to say specifically why Hilton's hotels performed better than Starwood's or Marriott's in the second quarter.

 

The company was more in sync with its peers in announcing new third-quarter forecasts that were down sharply from previous expectations.

 

It said it expects third-quarter earnings of about 10 cents a share, or well below the average First Call estimate of 17 cents. It said it expects full-year 2002 earnings in the low- to mid-50 cents range, again well below the average analysts' forecast of 62 cents.

 

The company said total revenue would be about flat in the third quarter from a year earlier and down 2 percent to 4 percent for the year. It said revenue per room for its owned hotels would be flat to down 2 percent in the third quarter and down in the low single digit percent range for the year.

 

``All things considered, Hilton's second-quarter numbers were OK,'' said J. Cogan, a senior research analyst at Banc of America Securities. ``The (room revenue) environment in the second quarter was disappointing for the lodging industry.''

 

In a separate matter, Hilton said it took a $10 million charge in the second quarter related to the discovery of mold in its $95 million Kalia tower, part of its Hilton Hawaiian Village resort at Waikiki.

 

It said the charge includes an estimated impairment loss for certain fixed assets, as well as the cost for investigative work and rectification of the problem. 

 

Felcor’s Second Quarter 2002 Funds From Operations $0.69 Per Share

FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (NYSE: FCH), one of the nation’s largest hotel real estate investment trusts (REITs), today reported operating results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2002.

FelCor’s second quarter 2002 recurring Funds From Operations (“FFO”) was $45.7 million, or $0.69 per share, which exceeded consensus analyst estimates of $0.68. 

FFO for the same period last year totaled $65.3 million, or $0.98 per share.  Assuming the 88 leases acquired on July 1, 2001, had been acquired on January 1, 2001, pro forma FFO would have been $72.4 million, or $1.08 per share for the second quarter 2001. 

Second quarter 2002 recurring Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, and other non-cash charges (“EBITDA”), totaled $94.6 million, compared to $111.4 million in the second quarter of 2001 and $118.5 million for the pro forma second quarter of 2001.  The Company reported net income of $13.0 million, or income per share of $0.12, compared to the second quarter 2001 net income of $22.6 million, or income per share of $0.31 and pro forma second quarter 2001 earnings of $24.1  million.  Second quarter 2002 net income includes a $5.9 million gain from the previously announced sale of the Allerton retail space in Chicago, Illinois, and the sale of the Doubletree Guest Suites®  hotel in Boca Raton, Florida.

For the six months ended June 30, 2002, FFO was $75.1 million, or $1.12 per share, compared to the same period last year of $136.8 million or $2.05 per share and on a pro forma basis was $141.3 million.  EBITDA for the six months was $171.8 million, compared to $228.8 million for the same period last year and $233.3 million for the same period on a pro forma basis.  Net  income for the six months was $6.9 million, compared to prior year of $15.8 million and pro forma prior year of  $50.5 million.  The prior year six months net income reflected $36.2 million of lease termination expense recorded in the first quarter of 2001.

FelCor’s total hotel portfolio RevPAR for the second quarter was 11.1 percent below that of the same period in 2001, with 56 percent of the decline related to average daily rate (“ADR”). 

Compared to the same months in 2001, RevPAR for April decreased 8.9 percent, May decreased 13.1 percent, and June decreased 11.3 percent.  For the quarter, occupancy was down 3.7 percentage points, to 65.7 percent, and ADR was down 6.0 percent, to $98.33, compared to the same quarter in 2001.  For the six month period, RevPAR decreased 14.6 percent.  The RevPAR decline for the month of July is estimated to be in the range of 5.0 to 6.0 percent, compared to prior year. 

“The industry’s recovery has not kept pace with previously anticipated levels, which is the result of the continued softness in corporate transient business,” said Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr., FelCor’s President and CEO.  “Despite this challenging economic environment, our total portfolio occupancy levels remain relatively strong at 66 percent, compared to the industry average of 63 percent.  The economic recovery is taking longer than expected, but we remain optimistic that RevPAR, as compared to prior year, will continue to improve on a steady and gradual basis.” 

The operating margin for FelCor’s portfolio was 35.5 percent during the second quarter of 2002, and represented a decline of 240 basis points, compared to the same period last year. 

However, FelCor’s operating margin for the second quarter increased from the 33.6 percent reported for the first quarter of 2002.  

During the second quarter of 2002, interest expense, net of interest income, was $41.6 million, compared to $40.3 million for the second quarter of the prior year, and for the six months was $82.8 million compared to $79.6 million in the same period last year.  The increase during the second quarter is primarily related to excess cash carried during 2002 and the related increase in average debt outstanding, compared to the same
period of 2001.   

Capital Structure: 

At June 30, 2002, FelCor had $151.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, and had no borrowings outstanding under its $615 million unsecured line of credit.  At quarter end, FelCor had  $1.9 billion of debt outstanding with a weighted average life of seven years and a weighted average interest cost of 8.3 percent.  The Company’s debt maturities for the remainder of 2002 are $6 million and 2003 maturities are $35 million.  

Since December 31, 2001, FelCor has reduced its outstanding debt by $56 million. 
In the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold non-strategic assets for net proceeds of

$23 million.  FelCor sold retail space at its Allerton Crowne Plaza® hotel in Chicago, Illinois, with net sales proceeds of $16.7 million and sold its 183-room Doubletree Guest Suites hotel in Boca  Raton, Florida, with net sales proceeds of $6.5 million.  The Boca Raton hotel had been previously identified as held for sale.  The Holiday Inn® in Colby, Kansas, is under contract for sale with an anticipated August closing and net sales
proceeds of $1.7 million. 

FelCor issued $25 million of perpetual preferred equity in April, and amended its unsecured line of credit in June 2002.  

“The sale of assets, issuance of perpetual preferred, and the amendment of the line of credit were steps taken to maintain our financial flexibility and to position FelCor for growth,”
said Richard
 

 J. O’Brien, FelCor’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.   

In July 2002, FelCor acquired the 208-suite SouthPark Suite Hotel in Charlotte, North Carolina for $14.5 million, and the 385-room Wyndham® Myrtle Beach Resort and Arcadian Shores Golf Club in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for $35.3 million.  

FelCor will convert the SouthPark Suite Hotel to a Doubletree Guest Suites hotel, and the Wyndham Myrtle Beach to a Hilton® hotel.  Both hotel acquisitions were funded from
excess cash held on FelCor’s balance sheet. 

 

Additional information can be found on the Company’s website at
www.felcor.com.

 

Mandarin cautious despite 96pc profit lift to US$ 12m
 
SCMP  -  Luxury hotel operator Mandarin Oriental International yesterday reported a 96 per cent surge in first-half profits but warned an uncertain global economy continued to affect business.

After tax and minority interests, the first-half profit was US$ 12.2 million, helped by lower interest expenses and a US$ 5-million write-back of development costs for a hotel in Washington. The company, a unit of Jardine Matheson, made US$ 6.2 million in the first half of last year.

Excluding the write-back, net profit was US$ 7.2 million, up 16.12 per cent year on year. Net finance charges fell 11.25 per cent to US$ 14.2 million, while administrative expenses shed 29 per cent to US$ 15.4 million.

Turnover slipped 3.88 per cent to US$ 272 million.

Chairman Simon Keswick said: "Uncertainty in the global economy continues to affect business, and booking patterns remain shorter than usual.

"The combined total revenue from the group's hotels declined due to the continued weakness in average room rates but prudent cost containment, together with the favourable interest rate environment, enabled the group to achieve some improvement in underlying profit."

Analysts said an improved result for one company was insufficient to conclude the hotel industry had recovered from the devastating impact of the September 11 attacks.

Last week, rival group Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels announced a 14 per cent drop in net profit to HK$ 121 million for the first half.

Although Mandarin Oriental's two Hong Kong hotels - the Mandarin Oriental and The Excelsior - showed some improvement in occupancy rates, average room rates fell as much as 17 per cent.

Hong Kong and Macau contributed US$ 8.6 million, or 41.34 per cent, of the group's first-half operating profit.

Earnings per share were 1.43 US cents. No interim dividend was declared, against 0.5 US cent per share a year ago.

UBS Warburg analyst Eric Wong attributed the unexpectedly good result mainly to a sharp reduction in interest costs and a lower base of comparison last year.

"It is too early to revise its full-year result although its performance in Southeast Asia, excluding Hong Kong and Singapore, has picked up," Mr Wong said.

Another analyst said: "The Hong Kong luxury hotel sector is pretty tough and has not recovered yet. I don't expect the luxury hotel market to improve in the second half of the year."

Mandarin Oriental financial director John Witt said the latest result represented a strong recovery in occupancy rates from the second half of last year.

The hospitality industry suffered a sharp decline in business and leisure travellers after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Mr Witt was confident of the prospects for the top-end market due to limited new supply of luxury hotel rooms in the next two years and a positive trend in tourist arrivals in Hong Kong.

"I think the first six months has been a very good start with our occupancy rate exceeding our expectations," he said.

Source: South China Morning Post

 

Barry Sternlicht of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide to Provide Keynote Address at the 13th Annual Hotel Investment Conference Asia Pacific (HICAP)

 

ASIA Travel Tips.com  - Barry S. Sternlicht, chairman and chief executive officer of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. will address delegates at the 13th Annual Hotel Investment Conference Asia Pacific (HICAP) on October 17, 2002. HICAP, formerly known as the Asia Pacific Hotel Investment Conference, will be held October 16-18, 2002 in Hong Kong.

 

According to HICAP founder Rob Stiles of Sonnenblick-Goldman Company, Sternlicht was invited to provide the keynote speech because of his worldwide reputation as a dynamic and inspiring hotel leader. "Barry is one of the most respected leaders in the hotel industry today. His ideas and leadership have brought innovative, new products and programs to the hospitality community," stated Stiles. HICAP Co-Chairman Robert Hecker of Horwath Asia Pacific added, " Barry heads up one of the leading hotel and leisure companies in the world with more than 740 properties in over 80 countries. Our international delegates no doubt will benefit from his insights into the trends and issues affecting the hotel industry performance and product evolution."

 

Among his accomplishments, Sternlicht has received accolades for introducing a revolutionary new guest room design for the Sheraton brand and the creation of Westin's famous "Heavenly Bed". USA Today reported that Starwood's Preferred Guest Program to be the top loyalty program in the world, less than four months after it was inaugurated. Sternlicht also is credited with the launch of the wildly popular W Hotels brand, with hotels in major United States cities and in Sydney, Australia and under development elsewhere in Asia".

 

During the precarious time of October 2001, HICAP drew nearly 300 delegates from over 20 countries. Stiles and Hecker both anticipate a capacity crowd for this year's event. "Registrations are running about 50% above last year's pace at this time. The quality of the program, and inclusion of Barry Sternlicht to the list of speakers, is expected to lead to a sell-out this year, " according to Stiles.

Source: ASIA Travel Tips.com

Holiday Inn Hotels Celebrates 50th Anniversary

August 1, 2002 marked the 50th anniversary of America's Hotel, Holiday Inn Hotels & Resorts.

American entrepreneur Kemmons Wilson opened the first Holiday Inn hotel in 1952 in Memphis, Tennessee, after he returned from a family road trip discouraged over the lack of family and value-oriented lodging.

Over the past fifty years, Holiday Inn has retained those core ideals of family, value and entrepreneurial spirit and has grown to become the most recognized lodging brand in the world.

Holiday Inn really set the standard for the hotel industry, said Greg Price, vice president of marketing for Holiday Inn. Today, we have more than 1,600 hotels across the world, and more people stay at Holiday Inn every day than anywhere else.

At the first Holiday Inn hotel, children stayed free, and the hotel offered a swimming pool, air conditioning and restaurant at the property. Telephones, ice and free parking were standard as well. Although commonplace today, these services were revolutionary at the time and set a standard for the hotel industry and for every Holiday Inn hotel that would follow.

As a driving force in the evolution of American lodging, Holiday Inn has paved the way for many other firsts in the full-service hotel category it created. Holiday Inn was the first national hotel franchisee organization and the first hotel company to sell a franchise. In 1963, it became the first hotel company to be publicly traded. The brand was the first hotel to offer in-room air conditioning, free in-room television, a swimming pool and an on-site restaurant.

In a continuing effort to deliver a high standard in the midscale lodging category, Six Continents Hotels, the owner of the Holiday Inn brand, has allocated $250 million over the next five years to build 25 Holiday Inn hotels in a new prototype design. Groundbreaking on the first new prototype is expected to happen this fall.

Over the years, the Holiday Inn family has extended to include the Holiday Inn Select brand for business travelers and Holiday Inn SunSpree Resorts for family fun. In addition, Six Continents Hotels created new brands such as Holiday Inn Express, the fastest growing hotel brand over the last decade, as a limited-service hotel offering for value conscious travelers, and Staybridge Suites by Holiday Inn as an extended-stay lodging option.

On August 1, the Holiday Inn brand marks their 50th birthday by ringing the closing bell at the New York Stock Exchange.

The Changing World of Trade Buyers

Issues facing buyers by and large, buyers (comprising of travel agents, tour operators and wholesalers) are being affected by the following factors:

1)       Consolidation among both buyers and sellers

2)       Market-share battles by the mega-groups

3)       Airline financial problems, commission- and other forms of cost- cutting, restructuring and development of loyalty programmes

4)       Insurance costs

5)       Consumer protection regulations

6)       Changes in lifestyles, consumer travel habits, including concerns over safety, fickle loyalty, shorter booking periods and shifts to stable destinations

7)       Development of Internet booking systems and the growth of direct-sell, bypassing middlemen

8)       Internal costs of restructuring, re- equipping, training and marketing, to name just a few challenges. At the same time, this is impacting on both travel marts and sellers themselves.

Buyers are becoming very selective about the marts they attend, and mart-organisers have to make sure that participating buyers will find the products they are looking for. Both have to ensure improved quality of contact.

Australia’s Advantage For the most part, Australia qualifies as a ‘good buy’ for several reasons: It is a stable country, relatively free of personal safety fears and travel advisories; it has reversed seasonality; has a multi-cultural, environmentally-conscious infrastructure with a huge diversity of tourism products; and the industry is generally well-managed and responsive. It is, overall, a ‘desirable’ destination with potential for generating high-yield business.

The Australian Tourist Commission also spends an enormous amount of time researching market trends and customer profiles, constantly fine- tunes its product offerings in line with those trends and supports productive buyers with tools to improve their business performance. These factors, among others, make the Australia Tourism Exchange an attractive show for buyers. At the same time, it yields a rich harvest of information about the changing profile of buyers.

The Globalisation Onslaught The global consolidation and expansion onslaught by the major U.S. and European travel groups will have a significant impact on the future of the industry. They are seeking to cut unit costs and build market share by linking up with other companies with access to distribution networks and databases. This is being done via outright purchases, cross-equity links, franchises, etc.

Their ability to use negotiating power to drive down prices and seize business is obvious. The borderline between wholesaler and retailer is fudging. All are cross-pollinating. At the ATE, one major German wholesaler made this quite obvious by offering six different brochures and the potential to sell via 10,000 travel agencies. Here are some of the emerging trends: All aspire to become one-stop shops to encourage the customer to buy everything from the one place, and keep buying from that place in the future.

Many are now selling directly over the Internet and using their own magazines and direct mail systems to reach customers. The days of printed brochures are set to fade. They are broadening their choice of products and services, but narrowing the number of suppliers in key categories like hotels. Some are trying to get into niche-market territory by setting up specialist departments focussing on destinations or fast-selling niche-products like wellness and ecotourism.

The Future of the Independents For the independents, it has clearly become a matter of life and death. But their biggest asset is the value they place in their independence. With that comes a corresponding determination to avoid becoming part of a large, monolithic organisation with its constant restructuring, cost-cutting, staff transfers, internal politics, ego battles and other problems.

One clear opportunity lies in specialisation. In terms of products, huge opportunities are emerging for small and medium-sized independent operators to focus on market segments that are still beyond the return-on- investment targets of the mega-groups. Such segments include senior travel, sports travel, travel by youth, students and backpackers, upmarket products, indigenous travel, wine tours, honeymoon packages, gay and lesbian travel. Here are some examples of new trends: One European company that specialised in group travel is "now changing more and more to upmarket and deluxe FITs." One Irish agency is run by a husband and wife team. Formerly a High Street retail travel agent, they now operate a Web-booking engine, business house travel section and wholesale arm specialising in Australia and New Zealand.

Wanting to become a one- stop shop for Irish agents, they also hold GSAs for various Australian products. Some niche-market agents are establishing partnerships with other tour operators and wholesalers who can cross-sell their products. For example, a specialist in golf tours links up with a wine-tour specialist. One Italian operator began focusing on Australia after years of specialising only in the Caribbean. One U.S. tour operator specialising in gourmet tours now works with wine-tasters and top chefs to develop cooking courses. Another U.S. agent focuses only on filling off- season beds and seats at "great prices."

Travel Web sites are also buying directly. One invited Web site buyer, who was formerly an airline ticket consolidator, claims to be the leading online pan- European tour operator and is planning a significant expansion of its land product programme to give passengers "the widest range of accommodation and broadest choice of ancillary product across all regions of Australia." One South Pacific tour operator specialises in handling the French military traffic which it describes as having high amounts of disposable income and high yield. Some are specialising in accommodation only.

In addition to offering some mainstream products, they offer boutique hotels, luxury resorts, private homes and apartments. This product range is being buttressed with luxury cruises and boat charters. One Belgium group says it only offers exclusive small-scale properties in unique locations. One buyer specialises in wildlife holidays to remote locations. One group has linked up with ticketing companies to sell only sports events like cricket matches, football, rugby, World Cup, Olympics, etc, calling itself a ticketing and tour operator. Others are also adding theatres and concerts, anything that involves tickets. There were two buyers from such companies, one of which is focussing not just on selling tickets but the entire management of visitors to sports events complete with logistics, transport schedules, accommodation, security and passes.

Trends in Asia

GROWING MATURITY OF THE CHINESE MARKET: After the initial chaos of the early days of outbound travel, the growing professionalism of the Chinese market is noticeable. Chinese buyers are part of huge conglomerates with huge economic strength and an extensive business network that gives them a good source of regular, corporate and incentive travel. Many are cross-linked with companies in Hong Kong SAR to access that market. They are increasingly becoming members of international organisations such as IATA and PATA and seeking higher standards of certification and professionalism.

Some of them are moving beyond groups and into individual travel, study tours or special interest travel. Many are spending time working on improving multi-language capabilities for their guides. Chinese operators dominate the turf in their respective regions. All appear to be very conscious of their reputation, size, level of respect and the number of travellers they send overseas. Some are setting up specialised departments to sell specific destinations such as Australia and New Zealand. Many are looking for new products to cater to the evolving taste of Chinese travellers.

Most do both inbound and outbound. In future, they will soon be at the professional level of operators in Hong Kong SAR where FIT travel is the rage and payments can be made over the Internet. Sellers wishing to tap the Chinese market will need people who can speak the language. Australia has many ethnic Chinese who are robustly capitalising on this asset.

MEGA-GROUPS EXPANDING: In Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, India and many other parts of Asia, mega- groups are making inroads and finding no shortage of local partners anxious to get global coverage, bring in a number of business travel accounts, and secure access to training, automation and distribution. Travel companies affiliated to charge-card companies are also growing their distribution networks. One Hong Kong SAR agency, focusing on niche markets such as special interest tours, study programmes, events management and deluxe FIT travel, has set up another company to take care of conferences and incentives.

INDIA, ANOTHER BIG GROWTH MARKET: Like China (PRC), India is another big potential growth market, but one with a much less structured industry. The sheer size and diversity of the market means infinite opportunity for operators to tap into niche segments: conferences, honeymooners, students, adventure, incentives, cruises, etc. Buyers are also Internet-savvy and anxious to establish new destinations. However, culinary requirements are very specific.

Operators also have to provide services like visas and foreign exchange handling. They are spreading their offices nationwide and acquiring GSAs. While the widespread use of English is an advantage, they are very sharp negotiators due to the size of the market.

JAPAN, MORE SPECIALISATION: The mass-market tour operators are expanding their distribution networks into more cities and becoming more specialised, leading the specialist tour operators to burrow even deeper. One operator linked to a major airline has now opened a division focusing only on the silver market. Another buyer who specialises in hotels has begun to sell direct to customers. In addition to hotel vouchers, it is now adding vouchers of other travel components to FIT trips. For example: sightseeing, optional tours, golf packages, weddings, cruises, rent a car.

KOREA (ROK), STRONGER INDUSTRY EMERGING: Since the 1997 economic crisis, Koreans have won plaudits for the way they have restructured many of their companies. Before 1997, Korean tour operators were considered mostly tour-group oriented and interested mainly in shopping commissions. Today, one of the invited buyers at the ATE described his company thus: ÒWe've made our multidisciplinary focus and integrated approach the foundation of building strategy, marketing segmentation, sales promotion, online strategy, enterprise systems and processes for our clients' competitive advantage. Several are expanding into specialist niches such as honeymooners, backpackers, young adventurers, etc, all of which indicates the growing sophistication of the market.

SOURCE: PATA

 

 



Ehotelier.com is a proud sponsor of the Center for Hospitality Research